A- de 2001
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett
✓Claimant Humberto De Jesus Longas Londoño
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Determinación de efectos de sus decisiones
- Presunción de control integral
- Presunción de control integral
- Alcance
- Situaciones
- Efectos
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se confirmó el auto suplicado por el cual se rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad interpuesta por el ciudadano de la referencia contra los artículos 1, 3, 17, 18, 38 y 39 de la Ley 546 de 1999, toda vez que se evidenció la ausencia de argumentos constitucionales que controviertan las razones expuestas por el Magistrado Sustanciador.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- RESUELVE:
- CONFIRMAR el auto suplicado, por el cual se rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad interpuesta por el ciudadano Humberto de Jesús Longas Londoño contra los artículos 1, 3, 17, 18, 38 y 39 de la Ley 546 de 1999.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.